What Golden Age?

Dan AndriaccoDan Andriacco is author of the Sebastian McCabe – Jeff Cody mystery series. His most “Golden Age” plot is The Disappearance of Mr. James Phillimore. Read his blog, “Dan Andriacco’s Baker Street Beat,” at www.danandriacco.com.


During dinner with some fellow mystery writers and fans at a mystery conference, I casually mentioned that I like mysteries from the Golden Age of detective fiction. One of the other writers said something along the lines of “What Golden Age?”

I think she knew that I was referring to the period from 1920 to 1940. What she meant was, was it really that golden? One could fairly argue that, from a strictly literary point of view, the works of today’s best mystery writers are far better than those produced between the world wars. They generally have deeper characterization and richer thematic development.

But that misses the point. “The Golden Age” has long been seen as an appropriate label for a heady time of great popularity and inventiveness for the genre. Mystery writers had their pictures on the cover of Time magazine. Critics proposed rules (Willard Huntington Wright) and even commandments (Monsignor Ronald A. Knox) for writing the detective story, and people debated them seriously.

Golden Age writers included such well remembered and still-read giants as Ellery Queen, Agatha Christie, Dorothy L. Sayers, John Dickson Carr, Margery Allingham, Josephine Tey, Erle Stanley Gardner, and Ngaio Marsh as well as lesser lights all but forgotten today.

In an introduction to the two “Golden Age” volumes of the Masterpieces of Mystery anthology series (Davis Publications, 1977), Queen summed up the characteristics of Golden Age novels as:

• ingenuity of plot,
• originality of concept, including the locked room, the miracle problem, and the impossible crime,
• subtle and legitimate misdirection of clues – poetic license – but always with complete fairness to the reader,
• and often a stunning surprise solution,
• in a phrase (R. Austin Freeman’s), “an exhibition of mental gymnastics.”

The Golden Age mystery was a generally a puzzle in words, with characterization and believability sacrificed to ingenuity. The least likely person “done it,” and an amateur sleuth usually outwitted the police. It was a game; not literature. Later, some Golden Age writers became more interested in character and motivation as the detective novel evolved toward the more complex and literary form that it is today. (See the later Dorothy L. Sayers and Ellery Queen.)

The Poisoned PenmanThe clever, complex, but ultimately implausible plot that requires the reader to suspend disbelief (Agatha Christie, call your office) still has its fans, but hardly any practitioners – at least in novels. I was startled recently to realize that the BBC “Sherlock” TV series, widely seen as one of the most innovative on the small screen when it was launched, actually echoes the Golden Age of detective fiction.

The clever clues and the multiple plot twists of this series inspire more admiration than belief. We aren’t expected to believe it; we’re expected to enjoy it. And we do.

In “The Empty Hearse,” for example, both the false and the real explanations of how Sherlock faked his death are as brilliant as they are implausible. The same could be said, with great appreciation, for several other plot elements and other episodes.

Although its main characters are better developed than in most Golden Age novels, I think that Ellery Queen himself would praise the amazing “exhibition of mental gymnastics” in the “Sherlock” series. The Golden Age is dead. Long live the Golden Age!



9 thoughts on “What Golden Age?

  1. A good article that will possibly spur readers unfamiliar with some of the writers you mention to investigate some of their work. There are, however, some who would disagree with your time frame–see http://gadetection.pbworks.com/w/page/7930628/FrontPage and https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/GAdetection/info–calling the Golden Age the period from 1920 to 1960.

    It’s not as recent as “Sherlock,” but the “Jonathan Creek” TV series was a lot of fun as the titular character solved a variety of impossible crimes. The series is available on DVD and rentable from Netflix.


  2. Excellent ideas! I totally agree. Some of those books are hard to read now. An online list is currently discussing misogyny in the 70s, but it was alive and well in this period also. Long live the Golden Age!


  3. I LOVE the Golden Age of detective fiction! But I agree that when I say that, it’s more of an idea than strictly adhering to those years nearly a century ago. As much as I love John Dickson Carr’s impossible crime plots, it’s just as much fun to see modern reinventions of the same mental puzzles — the TV show Jonathan Creek was one of the most clever modern takes on the locked-room mystery. I’m always looking for more Golden Age style mysteries, so I’m off to check out your books.


  4. Wonderful post and as someone who loves the Golden Age, thank you for sharing your thoughts on this. Although not detective fiction, I also thoroughly enjoy Stuart Palmer’s Hildegarde Withers Mysteries.


  5. I believe the ‘Golden Age’ of mystery writing has made it possible for modern day writers to build their craft upon. Whenever I get weary of modern stories, I go back and read some of my favorite writers from yesteryear. You have named every one of those writers I love. That is precisely the argument I use in saying young writers do not have proper foundation for their genre.


  6. I love the Golden Age writers, and still read some of them. But I also enjoy those who carry on the tradition and keep the focus on a challenging problem for sleuth and reader. I wish more readers were familiar with the older writers because they really defined the genre.


  7. Barbara and Susan, I agree! I’m amazed sometimes to speak to people who are writing detective fiction who have never read Sayers or Marsh or Tey, or any of the others who moved the genre forward. My own books are heavily influenced by those writers.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.